USA


Home  |  Blog  |  Contact
Mimosa Blog

Posts Tagged ‘custodian’

Adequately Securing ESI

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

The law firm of Gibson Dunn has just published their mid-year Electronic Discovery and Information Law Update and pointed out some interesting trends. The report can be viewed here.

From the Gibson Dunn report:

Of the 103 opinions Gibson Dunn analyzed, litigants sought sanctions in 30% (or 31)–compared to 42% in all of 2009–and received sanctions in 68% of those cases (or 21)–compared to 70% in all of 2009.


---------------------------------------------------------------------

Backups are an effective eDiscovery resource, if it’s the right backup

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

I have always been told relying on backups for eDiscovery purposes is a costly and time consuming mistake.

Searching through backup tapes or even a disk-based backup for eDiscovery is difficult. Imagine restoring 22 200 GB backup tapes of your employee workstations and


---------------------------------------------------------------------

The Classification & Collection of ESI from Custodian Workstations

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

One of the most painful and risky aspects of the EDRM process is the collection and preservation of uncontrolled custodian ESI on laptops and desktops for ECA and legal hold.


---------------------------------------------------------------------

Zubulake revisited

Thursday, January 14th, 2010

United States District Court Judge Shira A. Scheindlin issued five groundbreaking opinions in 2003 and 2004,  on the now very much known case of Zubulake v UBS Warburg.  This case is generally considered the first definitive case in the United States on a wide range of electronic discovery issues. These issues include:

  • Data sampling
  • The scope of the duty to preserve electronic evidence during the course of the litigation

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Reliance on Manual Litigation Hold is Risky

Friday, August 7th, 2009

In the case Pinstripe, Inc. v. Manpower, Inc., 2009 WL 2252131 (N.D. Okla. July 29, 2009), the defendant ran afoul of the litigation hold requirement by relying on a manual form of placing litigation holds, e.g. send litigation hold notices out to affected custodians.

The risk in this process is that 1. you have to send the notice out to all potentially affected custodians and 2. you have to be sure they read and understand the notice.


---------------------------------------------------------------------

Creating a Data Map for the “Meet and Confer” Session

Tuesday, November 25th, 2008

Section 26(f) of the new FRCP amendments points out the requirement of parties to the legal action must get together to discuss questions such as: what information must be produced, how that information will be collected, whats considered inaccessible and in what format the information is to be produced. This early meeting is called the “Meet and Confer”


---------------------------------------------------------------------