|
|
Archive for December, 2009
Wednesday, December 30th, 2009
In a recent posting on the ITBusinessEdge Blog, it was pointed out that large enterprises may be hesitant to adopt cloud computing and storage because of something called the National Security Letters.
Tags: court, Email, federal government, GC, legal risk, national security letters, patriot act, subpoena Posted in Bill Tolson, eDiscovery | No Comments »
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009
As with much in this industry many things are referred to with different phrases or acronyms. Earlier this week I read an interesting question on one of the discussion lists that I follow and the question was if the process of legal holds would also apply for pending or reasonably assumed investigations by regulatory agencies.
Posted in Compliance, Martin Tuip | No Comments »
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Thursday, December 17th, 2009
In my previous blog I exposed the naked truth about Exchange deleted items and how easy it is to destroy potential email records.
Microsoft must have listened because the new version Exchange 2010 includes substantial improvements to the “dumpster” and deleted item behavior and closed the potential “leak” for eDiscovery.
The new Exchange 2010 dumpster is a complete new design. Here is a link if you want the complete story.
Posted in Bob Spurzem, Compliance, eDiscovery | No Comments »
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Thursday, December 17th, 2009
To fully understand email discovery with Microsoft Exchange Server, you need to understand how the deleted item process works. Here is a quick summary.
For Exchange 2007 and earlier versions, deleted email is moved to the deleted folder. Once the deleted folder is emptied, the email moves into a system folder called the “dumpster”. Email remains in the dumpster for a time determined by the Admin. Typically this is 7 days. After 7 days, the email is permanently removed from Exchange.
Posted in Bob Spurzem, Compliance, eDiscovery | 1 Comment »
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday, December 16th, 2009
Two months ago Mimosa Systems announced that it further integrated with NetApp’s storage and data management solutions. This was an important announcement as Mimosa NearPoint is actually the only archiving product that offers multiple methods to ingest data for archiving from Exchange. Not only logshipping, but Journaling and now shadowless archiving.
Posted in Email Archiving, Martin Tuip | No Comments »
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday, December 15th, 2009
In a recent survey conducted by Osterman Research, it was revealed that 82 percent of employees use their personal email accounts to send large work-related files when an email attachment exceeds the size limit imposed by IT.
Is this a problem?…YES
Tags: cilil litigation, e-discovery, eDiscovery, elactronic discovery, Email, interrogatory, policy, responsive, survey Posted in Bill Tolson, eDiscovery | No Comments »
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday, December 9th, 2009
Last week I gave a webinar with fellow Exchange MVP Lee Benjamin on Exchange 2010 and how it handles PST files. You can actually listen to the recording at this link.
Posted in Exchange 2010 Archiving, Martin Tuip, PST Files | No Comments »
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday, December 8th, 2009
The following content was inspired by an article in Law Technology News in Oct 2009 by Tom O’Connor titled “Top 10 EDD Tips for General Counsel”.
Tags: e-discovery, eDiscovery, EDRM, electronic discovery, ESI, FRCP, Mensa, retention policy, Sedona Conference, Spoliation Posted in Bill Tolson, eDiscovery | No Comments »
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009
Southeastern Mechanical Services, Inc. v. Brody, 2009 WL 2883057 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 31, 2009)
In this recent case Southeastern Mechanical Services, Inc. (“SMS”) requested spoliation sanctions asserting that laptops and BlackBerries issued by Thermal Engineering Construction Services, Inc. (“TEI”) to Defendants Norman Brody, Jimmy Sherouse, and Kevin Smith were completely wiped of any data. SMS asserted that Defendants acted in bad faith in destroying crucial evidence that they had a duty to preserve so asked for an Adverse Inference order from the Judge.
Tags: adverse inference, blackberries, Email, hand held, Spoliation Posted in Bill Tolson, eDiscovery | No Comments »
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|